All posts in Federal Law & Regulation

Can’t I Let Non-Accredited Investors In My Round?

Crowdfunding is not yet legal, but the crowd is getting anxious. I was recently pressed by someone, “Can’t I let a non-accredited investor in my 506 round? The rule says that I can have 35 non-accrediteds in my round.”

While it is true that Rule 506 says you can have up to 35 non-accredited investor in your round, it goes on to say that if you allow even 1 non-accredited investor in your round you have to comply with very detailed and comprehensive disclosure obligations. In contrast, if you are raising money from only accredited investors, there are no specific disclosure obligations required.

Rule 502(b) states, “The issuer is not required to furnish the specified information to purchasers when it sells . . .to any accredited investor.” Whereas non-accredited investors require “disclosure documents that are generally the same as those used in registered offerings.” (See the rules and regulations here: http://taft.law.uc.edu/CCL/33ActRls/rule502.html; and a reference to the second quote here: http://www.sec.gov/answers/rule506.htm.)

This is one of the reasons why startups limit their fundraising to all accredited investor offerings.

See here: http://sec.gov/rules/proposed/2011/33-9211.pdf

Fiscal Cliff Bill Would Renew 100% Exclusion for QSB Stock Investments

QSB CliffThe fiscal cliff bill has a surprise few expected. It would renew through the end of 2013 the 100% exclusion from tax gain on qualified small business stock held for at least 5 years (there is a cap on the exclusion, but it is a substantial one).

This tax benefit, which expired at the end of 2011, would be extended for investments made through the end of calendar year 2013. Section 324 of the fiscal cliff bill states as follows:

SEC. 324. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY EXCLUSION OF 100 PERCENT OF GAIN ON CERTAIN SMALL BUSINESS STOCK.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (4) of section 1202(a) is amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘January 1, 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2014’’, and

(2) by striking ‘‘AND 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘, 2011, 2012, AND 2013’’ in the heading thereof.

****

Paragraph (4) currently reads as follows:

(4) 100 percent exclusion for stock acquired during certain periods in 2010 and 2011

In the case of qualified small business stock acquired after the date of the enactment of the Creating Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 and before January 1, 2012—

(A) paragraph (1) shall be applied by substituting “100 percent” for “50 percent”,

(B) paragraph (2) shall not apply, and

(C) paragraph (7) of section 57 (a) shall not apply.

****

Therefore, as amended, Paragraph (4) will read as follows:

(4) 100 percent exclusion for stock acquired during certain periods in 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013

In the case of qualified small business stock acquired after the date of the enactment of the Creating Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 and before January 1, 2014—

(A) paragraph (1) shall be applied by substituting “100 percent” for “50 percent”,

(B) paragraph (2) shall not apply, and

(C) paragraph (7) of section 57 (a) shall not apply.

****

There were also technical amendments included. I’ve quoted them below.

(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—

 (1) SPECIAL RULE FOR 2009 AND CERTAIN PERIOD IN 2010.—Paragraph (3) of section 1202(a) is amended by adding at the end the following new flush sentence:

‘‘In the case of any stock which would be described in the preceding sentence (but for this sentence), the acquisition date for purposes of this subsection shall be the first day on which such stock was held by the taxpayer determined after the application of section 1223.’’.

(2) 100 PERCENT EXCLUSION.—Paragraph (4) of section 1202(a) is amended by adding at the end the following new flush sentence:

‘‘In the case of any stock which would be described in the preceding sentence (but for this sentence), the acquisition date for purposes of this subsection shall be the first day on which such stock was held by the taxpayer determined after the application of section 1223.’’.

(c) EFFECTIVE DATES.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply to stock acquired after December 31, 2011.

(2) SUBSECTION (b)(1).—The amendment

made by subsection (b)(1) shall take effect as if included in section 1241(a) of division B of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

(3) SUBSECTION (b)(2).—The amendment made by subsection (b)(2) shall take effect as if included in section 2011(a) of the Creating Small Business Jobs Act of 2010.

General Solicitation for Startups

The SEC has finally issued proposed rules that would eliminate the prohibition against general solicitation and advertising in Rule 506 offerings. The proposed rules are good news for startups because they offer broader access to investment capital sources, and the SEC should be applauded for its reasoned and reasonable approach in the new rules.

There was a lot of handwringing and blog ink spilled over what the SEC might do with Section 201 of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”). Recall that the JOBS Act directed the SEC to amend Rule 506 of Regulation D to permit general solicitation or general advertising in offerings made under Rule 506, provided that all purchasers of the securities were accredited investors. Section 201 of the JOBS Act went on to require that the SEC’s rules require the issuer to take reasonable steps to verify that the purchasers of the securities were accredited investors, using such methods as determined by the SEC.

I have highlighted some of the most significant quotes and points from SEC Release No. 33-9354 below. Continue reading →